Geraldo Rivera, the Great American Pimp

While our president is busy sucking up favor with Hugo Chavez, much in the same way Slick Willy sold out to China, I want to comment on a little discussed matter of the Prostitution Tax.

Last night on O'Reilly, Geraldo Rivera made a plea for legalizing prostitution, but this is what he said: "Let's out and out legalize it tax it!"

No pause, no dot dot dot, no comma after the "legalize it" part. Just "let's legalizeittaxit" - Yeah baby!! Let's legalize-something-so-we-can-tax-it! Woo hoo!!

I don't know much about Geraldo Rivera except I've just seen him doing his thing on FoxNews the last years and he always seems like he goes with whatever looks popular, right or left. He's left here, he's right there...He stays SAFE so he can get a lot of praise from whatever side might be handing it out that week and get him a lot of press.

But...at least I finally got a glimpse of what Geraldo really wants. He wants prostitution to be legalized so it can be taxed.

Excuse me, don't we have enough taxation already??

According to Geraldo's train of thought, we need even MORE taxation. Legalizing prostitution would most assuredly require MORE government intervention, MORE government regulation, MORE policing, MORE fees, MORE health workers, MORE welfare, MORE public health policy, MORE public health expenses, MORE pages in the Tax Code...MORE taxation.

Do you think a prostitution tax will cover all this? NOT going to happen. The taxpayers will end up paying MORE than what a prostitute can cover with her government-imposed taxation. Furthermore, how is government going to keep track of her account books? Will the government set up an accounting system for her? Appoint a Czar to oversee her books? Write policy on what she should be earning by the hour or night based on her demographics, age, looks, potential clientele?

To engage in any thought of this is digusting and backwards. The People made prostitution illegal for a reason! It is harmful not just to the woman doing it, but to everybody. To children, mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles, sisters and brothers. It hurts neighbors, businesses and communities because it is a behavior based in desperation, unwillingness and coercion.

By legalizing it, government - The People - make it legitimate. It forces everyone in society to embrace it as a normal way of life, a normal activity, a normal and accepted way to make a living. There is nothing that can be further from the truth.

Geraldo Rivera's statements last night on O'Reilly are nothing more than a drooling lunge for more taxation and more burdens upon the American people.

Signs Signs Everywhere There's Signs...

Here's MY sign Globama:

Income Tax
County Tax
Town Tax
Fuel Tax
Electric Tax
Phone Tax
Property Tax
View Tax
Sin Tax
Gift Tax
Food Tax
Clothing Tax
School Tax
Capital Gains Tax
Social Security Tax
Medicare Tax
Retirement Tax
Travel Tax
Death Tax

Here's your sign . It will be held up at an American Tea Party on April 15, 2009, something not seen since pre-1776.

Yours truly,
an "Arrogant American"

What Globama's "bigger government" means for you!

Libertarians, Republitarians, Constitutionalists, Minutemen, Patriots ...the Glo-Team has you listed as "Domestic Terrorists"
http://www.kansascity.com/116/story/1086524.html

If you have a Ron Paul bumper sticker - check, Terrorist

If you wave a "Don't Tread on Me" flag - check, Terrorist

If you belong to a constitutionally protected Militia - check, Terrorist

If you support a party other than democrat or republican - check, Terrorist

If you have media that reports abuses of the Federal Government - check, Terrorist

Isn't it ironic? If you're a gay person who spits on old ladies, throws rocks through church pastors' windows, or someone who plants bombs under police cruisers - you're a Militant. If you're a student who throws mud at a public speaker or a housewife who dresses up like a witch and screams obscenities at a Palin rally - you're an Activist.

If you're Globama, it is no longer appropriate to call members of the Taliban Enemy Combatants. If you're the Globama-appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, the appropriate name now for the perpetrators of 911 are Men.

Truly, I don't think this has anything to do with potential violence or "domestic terrorism." This is a "message" from Team Globama that clearly states: "Shut up about my socialist agenda, or else..."

Voter fraud organization ACORN to assist Globama and his sidekick Rahm Emanuel in the 2010 Census

Is this really a surprise? Of course not, yet millions of American citizens will either turn a blind eye or simply "come to the alter" of their corrupt leader, having no clue of ACORN's history, purpose and intent.

ACORN receives funding from a variety of private charitable organizations that are widely recognized as "liberal," including the Bauman Family Foundation, George Soros' Open Society Institute and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. [10].
ACORN and its affiliates also receive funding from more traditional sources, such as corporate foundations, including the JPMorgan Chase Foundation, Ben & Jerry's foundation, the Bank of America Charitable Foundation, and Citigroup, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and foundations affiliated with the founder of United Parcel Service (UPS). [11]. A full list of ACORN and ACORN affiliate donors is available from the Capital Research Center, a non-profit organization which studies political advocacy groups (PDF format). [12].
Donations to ACORN from traditionally "progressive" groups has drawn criticism to the social justice organization from other political organizations. The Consumer Rights League (CRL), in particular, has focused on ACORN's funding. They assert that ACORN's budget is "is fed by extracting immense resources from labor unions, government grants, private foundations, its members, and "settlements" with targeted businesses".[13].
A press release from CRL on June 18, 2008 claimed, "The ACORN Housing Association (AHC), an ACORN affiliate that receives over 40% of its funding from government sources, claims to be a consumer advocate. In a newly-released report from CRL, however, a series of documents obtained from a whistleblower source reveals hypocritical and potentially illegal use of taxpayer dollars by ACORN and its related organizations."[14]
ACORN's financial construction has also led to investigation by authorities. According to an October 21, 2008 article in the New York Times, "Acorn faces demands for back taxes by the Internal Revenue Service and various state tax authorities."
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/ACORN

This is just the "nice" stuff about ACORN. You can rarely find information anymore about ACORN's ties to New York City mafia bosses and their thug-style control over NYC politicians.

Let there be no doubt. Globama intends to be re-elected in 2012 even if it means continued voter fraud, non-publicized financiers, and fraudulent adjusting of voter districts.

I personally would like to thank Senator Judd Gregg for telling the Globama team to stick it up their arse.

Judd Gregg, 2012?? hmmm......

Globama singing "values" in the wake of the 912 Project and Tea Parties

"This isn't just a matter of dollars and cents. It's about our fundamental values."- Barack Obama

You can't be serious.

The messiah Globama TOOK our money against our wishes, GAVE it to the corrupt bankers and Wall Street execs, the execs spent the money exactly the way Globama KNEW they would...and now he whines and jumps on the "values" bandwagon??

The citizens of the U.S. just held massive Tea Party and 912 Project movements, then the backlash of Globama's bonus payoffs to Wall Street execs hits him in the face, and he starts crying "Values!!"

Two words:

No, three.....

Bull Fucking Shit.

Globama now wants to tax health insurance benefits
(but don't put his name on it!)

from the Washington Post:
This week, White House budget director Peter Orszag said taxing employer benefits was among several ideas that "most firmly should remain on the table." White House economic adviser Jason Furman called for an end to the so-called "employer exclusion" before he joined the administration. Meanwhile, some congressional Democrats say the White House has signaled that Obama would accept a tax on employer benefits as long as he didn't have to propose it himself.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/11/AR2009031103827.html?hpid=moreheadlines